Fundamentals / Stone Age / Formless / Recollection / Essentials / Notation / Combined Forms / Tiny Shapes / Clip-on / OOAK
Fallacy 01 — Non-sequitur
When the conclusion does not follow from the premises. In more informal reasoning, it can be when what is presented as evidence or reason is irrelevant or adds very little support to the conclusion.
4.5 centimeters by 1.2 centimeters, latte, pebbled leather texture
When the conclusion does not follow from the premises. In more informal reasoning, it can be when what is presented as evidence or reason is irrelevant or adds very little support to the conclusion.
4.5 centimeters by 1.2 centimeters, black, pebbled leather
When the conclusion does not follow from the premises. In more informal reasoning, it can be when what is presented as evidence or reason is irrelevant or adds very little support to the conclusion.
4.5 centimeters by 1.2 centimeters, latte, concrete texture
When the conclusion does not follow from the premises. In more informal reasoning, it can be when what is presented as evidence or reason is irrelevant or adds very little support to the conclusion.
4.5 centimeters by 1.2 centimeters, white
When the conclusion does not follow from the premises. In more informal reasoning, it can be when what is presented as evidence or reason is irrelevant or adds very little support to the conclusion.
4.5 centimeters by 1.2 centimeters, black
When the conclusion does not follow from the premises. In more informal reasoning, it can be when what is presented as evidence or reason is irrelevant or adds very little support to the conclusion.
4.5 centimeters by 1.2 centimeters, oat milk
Fallacy 02 — Moderation
Asserting that given any two positions, there exists a compromise between them that must be correct.
5 centimeters by 1.2 centimeters, black, pebbled leather texture
Asserting that given any two positions, there exists a compromise between them that must be correct.
5 centimeters by 1.2 centimeters, latte, pebbled leather texture
Asserting that given any two positions, there exists a compromise between them that must be correct.
5 centimeters by 1.2 centimeters, cashmere, concrete texture
Asserting that given any two positions, there exists a compromise between them that must be correct.
5 centimeters by 1.2 centimeters, cashmere, snake skin
Asserting that given any two positions, there exists a compromise between them that must be correct.
5 centimeters by 1.2 centimeters, black
Asserting that given any two positions, there exists a compromise between them that must be correct.
5 centimeters by 1.2 centimeters, latte, concrete texture
Asserting that given any two positions, there exists a compromise between them that must be correct.
5 centimeters by 1.2 centimeters, oat milk
Asserting that given any two positions, there exists a compromise between them that must be correct.
5 centimeters by 1.2 centimeters, white
Fallacy 03 — Ludic
The ludic fallacy, proposed by Nassim Nicholas Taleb in his book The Black Swan, is "the misuse of games to model real-life situations". Taleb explains the fallacy as "basing studies of chance on the narrow world of games and dice.
5 centimeters by 1.2 centimeters, black
The ludic fallacy, proposed by Nassim Nicholas Taleb in his book The Black Swan, is "the misuse of games to model real-life situations". Taleb explains the fallacy as "basing studies of chance on the narrow world of games and dice".
5 centimeters by 1.2 centimeters, oat milk, concrete texture
The ludic fallacy, proposed by Nassim Nicholas Taleb in his book The Black Swan, is "the misuse of games to model real-life situations". Taleb explains the fallacy as "basing studies of chance on the narrow world of games and dice.
5 centimeters by 1.2 centimeters ,latte, pebbled leather
The ludic fallacy, proposed by Nassim Nicholas Taleb in his book The Black Swan, is "the misuse of games to model real-life situations". Taleb explains the fallacy as "basing studies of chance on the narrow world of games and dice".
5 centimeters by 1.2 centimeters, oat milk
The ludic fallacy, proposed by Nassim Nicholas Taleb in his book The Black Swan, is "the misuse of games to model real-life situations". Taleb explains the fallacy as "basing studies of chance on the narrow world of games and dice".
5 centimeters by 1.2 centimeters, cashmere, snake skin texture
The ludic fallacy, proposed by Nassim Nicholas Taleb in his book The Black Swan, is "the misuse of games to model real-life situations". Taleb explains the fallacy as "basing studies of chance on the narrow world of games and dice".
5 centimeters by 1.2 centimeters, black, pebbled leather texture
The ludic fallacy, proposed by Nassim Nicholas Taleb in his book The Black Swan, is "the misuse of games to model real-life situations". Taleb explains the fallacy as "basing studies of chance on the narrow world of games and dice".
5 centimeters by 1.2 centimeters, white
Fallacy 04 — Regression
Ascribing a cause where none exists in situations where natural fluctuations exist while failing to account for these natural fluctuations.
7 centimeters by 1.5 centimeters, black, pebbled leather texture
Ascribing a cause where none exists in situations where natural fluctuations exist while failing to account for these natural fluctuations.
7 centimeters by 1.5 centimeters, latte, pebbled leather
Fallacy 05 — Modal
In short, a modal fallacy involves making a formal argument invalid by confusing the scope of what is actually necessary or possible.
8 centimeters by 1.2 centimeters, cashmere, snake skin texture
In short, a modal fallacy involves making a formal argument invalid by confusing the scope of what is actually necessary or possible.
8 centimeters by 1.2 centimeters, black, pebbled leather texture
In short, a modal fallacy involves making a formal argument invalid by confusing the scope of what is actually necessary or possible.
8 centimeters by 1.2 centimeters, latte, pebbled leather texture
In short, a modal fallacy involves making a formal argument invalid by confusing the scope of what is actually necessary or possible.
8 centimeters by 1.2 centimeters, oat milk
Fallacy 06 – Homunculus
An argument that accounts for a phenomenon in terms of the very phenomenon that it is supposed to explain, which results in an infinite regress.
7.5 centimeters by 1.2 centimeters, cashmere, snake skin texture
An argument that accounts for a phenomenon in terms of the very phenomenon that it is supposed to explain, which results in an infinite regress.
7.5 centimeters by 1.2 centimeters, black pebbled leather texture
An argument that accounts for a phenomenon in terms of the very phenomenon that it is supposed to explain, which results in an infinite regress.
7.5 centimeters by 1.2 centimeters, black
An argument that accounts for a phenomenon in terms of the very phenomenon that it is supposed to explain, which results in an infinite regress.
7.5 centimeters by 1.2 centimeters, latte pebbled leather texture
Fallacy 07 — Furtive
The furtive fallacy is an informal fallacy of emphasis in which outcomes are asserted to have been caused by the hidden misconduct or wrongdoing by decision makers.
8.5 centimeters by 1.2 centimeters, cashmere, snake skin texture
The furtive fallacy is an informal fallacy of emphasis in which outcomes are asserted to have been caused by the hidden misconduct or wrongdoing by decision makers.
8.5 centimeters by 1.2 centimeters, black pebbled leather texture
The furtive fallacy is an informal fallacy of emphasis in which outcomes are asserted to have been caused by the hidden misconduct or wrongdoing by decision makers.
8.5 centimeters by 1.2 centimeters, black
The furtive fallacy is an informal fallacy of emphasis in which outcomes are asserted to have been caused by the hidden misconduct or wrongdoing by decision makers.
8.5 centimeters by 1.2 centimeters, oat milk
Fallacy 08 — If-by-whiskey
A response to a question that is contingent on the questioner’s opinions and makes use of words with strong connotations. This fallacy appears to support both sides of an issue -- a tactic common in politics.
9 centimeters by 1.5 centimeters, latte, pebbled leather texture
When the conclusion does not follow from the premises. In more informal reasoning, it can be when what is presented as evidence or reason is irrelevant or adds very little support to the conclusion.
4.5 centimeters by 1.2 centimeters, cashmere, snake skin texture